Site icon OHSE

Case Studies in Incident Investigation

ohse.ca
OHSE A book titled OHSE-Incident Investigation & Response is on a table surrounded by a magnifying glass, compass, pens, and paper clips. The cover features graphs, target symbols, and data analytics visuals in orange, blue, and black—perfect tools for ensuring safety in any environment. SAFETY

OHSE A book titled OHSE--Incident Investigation & Response is on a table surrounded by a magnifying glass, compass, pens, and paper clips. The cover features graphs, target symbols, and data analytics visuals in orange, blue, and black—perfect tools for ensuring safety in any environment. SAFETY

Table of Contents

5.1. Case Study 1: Root Cause Analysis of a Major Industrial Accident

Background: A large manufacturing plant experienced a catastrophic equipment failure that resulted in significant property damage and multiple injuries. The incident occurred during routine operations on a production line, leading to a sudden explosion in one of the main production units.

Incident Overview:

Investigation Process:

  1. Initial Response:
    • The area was immediately evacuated, and emergency services were contacted. First responders provided medical assistance to the injured employees, and the fire department worked to control the fire caused by the explosion. The scene was secured to prevent further damage and to preserve evidence for investigation.
  2. Data Collection:
    • Investigators collected physical evidence from the site, including fragments of the failed equipment, control panel logs, and maintenance records. Witnesses, including the employees who were on duty at the time, were interviewed to gather their accounts of the events leading up to the explosion.
  3. Root Cause Analysis:
    • Primary Method Used: Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
    • Findings:
      • Direct Cause: The immediate cause of the explosion was a pressure build-up in a faulty valve that failed to release excess pressure in the system.
      • Contributing Factors:
        • Inadequate maintenance procedures: The faulty valve had not been inspected or serviced according to the recommended schedule.
        • Lack of employee training: Operators were not adequately trained to recognize early warning signs of equipment failure.
        • Communication breakdown: Previous reports of minor issues with the valve were not effectively communicated to the maintenance team.

Corrective Actions:

Lessons Learned:

Follow-Up:

5.2. Case Study 2: Addressing Human Error in Incident Investigation

Background: A logistics company experienced an incident in which a forklift operator accidentally struck a warehouse support column, causing structural damage and injuring a nearby worker. The incident raised concerns about human error and its role in workplace accidents.

Incident Overview:

Investigation Process:

  1. Initial Response:
    • The area was immediately cordoned off, and the injured worker received first aid. The forklift operator was removed from duty pending the investigation. The scene was preserved, and witnesses were asked to remain available for interviews.
  2. Data Collection:
    • Investigators reviewed the forklift’s operation logs, the operator’s training records, and maintenance reports for the equipment. Witnesses, including the injured worker and other employees in the area, were interviewed to gather information about the incident.
  3. Human Error Analysis:
    • Primary Method Used: The 5 Whys Method
    • Findings:
      • Direct Cause: The forklift operator failed to notice the support column while reversing, leading to the collision.
      • Contributing Factors:
        • Inadequate visibility: The warehouse layout made it difficult for operators to see certain obstacles.
        • Operator fatigue: The operator had been working extended shifts without adequate breaks, leading to decreased attention.
        • Insufficient training: The operator had not received recent refresher training on safe forklift operation, particularly in tight spaces.

Corrective Actions:

Lessons Learned:

Follow-Up:

5.3. Case Study 3: Investigating Environmental Incidents

Background: An environmental consulting firm was called to investigate a chemical spill at a pharmaceutical manufacturing plant. The spill resulted in the contamination of nearby soil and water sources, raising concerns about long-term environmental impacts and regulatory compliance.

Incident Overview:

Investigation Process:

  1. Initial Response:
    • The affected area was immediately contained, and the spill response team initiated cleanup procedures. Regulatory authorities were notified, and the plant was temporarily shut down to prevent further contamination.
  2. Data Collection:
    • Investigators collected soil and water samples for analysis, reviewed chemical storage records, and examined the condition of the storage tanks. Witnesses, including employees who were present during the spill, were interviewed to understand how the spill occurred.
  3. Environmental Impact Analysis:
    • Primary Method Used: Environmental Risk Assessment
    • Findings:
      • Direct Cause: The spill was caused by a leak in an aging storage tank that had not been properly maintained.
      • Contributing Factors:
        • Inadequate maintenance: The storage tanks were overdue for inspection and maintenance, leading to the deterioration of seals and fittings.
        • Lack of secondary containment: The storage area lacked adequate secondary containment measures, allowing the spill to spread to surrounding soil and water sources.
        • Insufficient monitoring: The plant’s environmental monitoring system failed to detect the leak in a timely manner, delaying the response.

Corrective Actions:

Lessons Learned:

Follow-Up:

5.4. Case Study 4: Small-Scale Incident with Large-Scale Implications

Background: A small manufacturing company experienced a minor incident in which a worker sustained a burn injury from a malfunctioning piece of equipment. While the injury was minor, the investigation revealed significant underlying issues with the company’s safety management system.

Incident Overview:

Investigation Process:

  1. Initial Response:
    • The injured worker received first aid, and the heat press machine was immediately shut down. The area was secured for investigation, and production was temporarily halted to assess the situation.
  2. Data Collection:
    • Investigators examined the heat press machine, reviewed maintenance logs, and interviewed the injured worker and other employees who had used the machine. The investigation focused on identifying any mechanical issues and assessing the operator’s actions.
  3. Comprehensive Safety Analysis:
    • Primary Method Used: Systemic Review of Safety Management System
    • Findings:
      • Direct Cause: The burn injury occurred when the heat press machine malfunctioned due to a faulty thermostat.
      • Contributing Factors:
        • Lack of routine maintenance: The machine had not undergone routine maintenance checks, leading to the failure of the thermostat.
        • Inadequate safety protocols: The company’s safety protocols did not require regular inspections of the equipment, relying instead on reactive maintenance.
        • Poor safety culture: The investigation revealed a lack of emphasis on safety within the company, with employees reporting minimal training and awareness of safety procedures.

Corrective Actions:

Lessons Learned:

Follow-Up:

Summary of Chapter 5

In this chapter, we explored various case studies that highlight the importance of thorough incident investigations. Each case study illustrated different aspects of incident investigation, including root cause analysis, addressing human error, investigating environmental incidents, and understanding the broader implications of minor incidents. These real-world examples provided valuable insights into the challenges and best practices in incident investigation and response.

Exit mobile version